Increase awareness of accessibility and its relation to computer applications
Encourage and inspire people to work on accessibility
Help the free software community improve its accessibility
These come from the rules the front page encourages everyone to read. Divided into Long-Term and Short-Term Tasks, the rules read more like a sweepstakes than an employment agreement or contract. Still, the fundamentals are oddly close to a work for hire: you perform a set of tasks, and are rewarded with money. $6000 for Long-Term tasks, $200 for Short-Term tasks.
On the subject of short-term tasks, the tasks list page says:
Are you a developer who wants to become more familiar with accessibility? Are you an artist that can draw? Maybe you might also be interested in becoming a module maintainer some day. A great way to get started is by fixing bugs, and we're offering you a way to get paid to do it. :-)
Short term tasks are two week affairs that pay out $200 each (in bundles of five) a construction similar to Google's "Highly Open Participation Contest". Unfortunately, I doubt any of the people completing them expect to claim any prize money. It's a simple matter of math: if any task takes more than 30 hours, flipping burgers pays better (where I live).
Bundling by fives is crazy. It discourages participants simply by the unknown quantity of effort and massive investment before payout. But it gets worse. A sufficiently clever person can nullify all monetary incentive for some tasks and a sufficiently conscientious person will avoid completing tasks they don't intend to claim a prize on. An example: there's only five "Create 10 Accessible Icons" tasks posted. Completing one task effectively reserves the rest for you. Certainly, if you try one, finish it, and decide the other four tasks are too much work to bother with, you've removed the intended monetary incentive, albeit accidentally.
This assumes the flow of tasks is stagnant, though I've seen only evidence supporting that assumption. If you can't find five tasks you think you can claim before anyone else does, you can either wait until new tasks come along or start now and hope they do. Worse still, many of the small task bugs marked as completed were done without knowledge of the Outreach Program it seems. A total of six small tasks are marked completed:
The first two bugs were closed by an Ekiga developer as WONTFIX. Folks, it doesn't get any more classic Bugzilla than that. The middle two were fixed by a developer being paid for their work by Sun. Only the last two were claimed tasks under the Outreach Program. So of the 30 total Short-Term task claims, 2 have been fixed thus far via Outreach.
Long term tasks are closer to Google Summer of Code in nature: 6 month projects netting $6000. Thus far, there have been two proposals accepted; "MouseTrap: Head Tracking via Lowcost Webcam" and Magnification.
MouseTrap was actually working two months ago. You can see video of it in action:
And the magnification task is being worked on by the developer of Compiz's Enhanced Zoom. They're both talented people and I'm sure the money motivates them to continue the work they started outside of GNOME.
Will they meet their goals?
With half a year yet to go, it seems unfair to make any doom and gloom predictions. So instead, let's examine where they stand now in relation to their goals.
Have they helped improve free software accessibility? Yes. Not as much as they hoped, but there's time left to save it. They've fixed a few bugs, enticed a few projects towards GNOME that could have large impact.
Have they encourage and inspire people to work on accessibility? They've certainly encouraged the two Long-Term authors, though maybe not inspired them. Another three people seemed inspired enough to pick up some short term tasks, but none seem on pace to net five Completed Tasks.
Have they increased awareness of accessibility? I'd say not enough. This is an "outreach program", but it almost seems GNOME needs "inreach" to convince their own project members accessibility matters. Normally when I think of outreach I think of an expert organization going to the public to share that expertise, not an organization in search of experts. Closing bugs as WONTFIX that Foundation and Sponsors are trying to pay someone to fix does not look like an organization full of accessibility experts. If GNOME leadership doesn't convince the rank and file that it needs accessibility, outside contribution faces a hurdle that could leave them bitter on the subject. This sort of failure jeopardizes any success found in the previous two questions.
Still, $6,000 is a cheap price for getting some of the Compiz people thinking about how GNOME might ever integrate their work. And a cheap price to get the ball rolling on head tracking within GNOME. If we're lucky, in some distant future we might see eye tracking as well!